vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($49.7M vs $48.6M, roughly 1.0× Ouster, Inc.). Ouster, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs -3.8%, a 12.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (48.9% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.2% CAGR vs -1.0%).
Gen Korean BBQ is an American chain of all-you-can-eat Korean barbecue restaurants mainly concentrated around the Western U.S. It opened in 2011, and has since grown to 43 locations as of 2024.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
GENK vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $49.7M | $48.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $4.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.9% |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | 17.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.8% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.0% | 48.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -821.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.4M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.3M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.9M | $27.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-566.0K | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-261.0K | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-301.0K | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-206.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0K | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $277.0K | $-23.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -24.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.4% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.8% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.4% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | -93.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.5% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | -88.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $-0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | $173.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.5M | $275.6M |
| Total Assets | $259.9M | $381.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $173.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $184.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.5M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.8M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.5M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | $170.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $381.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $259.9M | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.5M | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $232.4M | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.4M | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.7M | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.8M | $309.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-426.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-426.0K | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $-21.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.6M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.0K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-22.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.3% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.3% | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.9% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | -81.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GENK
Segment breakdown not available.
OUST
| Product revenue | $48.2M | 99% |
| Royalties | $347.0K | 1% |
