vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($71.1M vs $49.7M, roughly 1.4× GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.0% vs -3.8%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.8% vs -9.0%). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.5M vs $-5.6M). Over the past eight quarters, GEN Restaurant Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.0% CAGR vs -4.7%).
Gen Korean BBQ is an American chain of all-you-can-eat Korean barbecue restaurants mainly concentrated around the Western U.S. It opened in 2011, and has since grown to 43 locations as of 2024.
RE/MAX is an international real estate franchise operating in over 100 countries and territories that, in 2015, had over 100,000 agents in 6,800 offices.
GENK vs RMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $49.7M | $71.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | -3.8% | 2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.0% | -1.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -821.4% | -75.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.4M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.3M | $74.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.7M | $72.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $78.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.9M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.8M | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-566.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-261.0K | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-301.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-206.0K | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0K | $966.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $277.0K | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $496.0K | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | -24.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.4% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | -4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | $118.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.6M | $432.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.5M | $452.4M |
| Total Assets | $259.9M | $582.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | 0.96× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $94.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $89.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $66.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.1M | $82.1M |
| Q4 25 | $13.6M | $432.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | $433.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | $434.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $435.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $437.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $438.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | $439.0M |
| Q4 25 | $26.5M | $452.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | $448.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.8M | $433.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $429.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.5M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | $418.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.4M | $412.0M |
| Q4 25 | $259.9M | $582.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.5M | $582.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $232.4M | $571.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.4M | $581.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.7M | $578.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.8M | $571.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.5M | $566.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | 1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.16× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.19× | 1.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-426.0K | $40.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.6M | $33.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.3% | 47.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.5% | 10.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 28.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.3M | $56.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-426.0K | $40.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.6M | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.0K | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.8M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-586.0K | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | -11.3% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 73.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.1% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.96× | 18.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.06× | 4.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.08× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GENK
Segment breakdown not available.
RMAX
| Franchising Segment | $50.1M | 70% |
| Broker Fees | $13.9M | 20% |
| Annual Dues | $7.4M | 10% |
