vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP (GEOS) and i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.2× i-80 Gold Corp.). GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP runs the higher net margin — -38.2% vs -401.9%, a 363.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-17.6M vs $-39.2M).
Geospace Technologies Corporation is a manufacturer of specialized electronics and seismic data acquisition equipment used in the oil and gas industry. Geospace Technologies has been publicly traded on the NASDAQ stock exchange since November 1997.
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
GEOS vs IAUX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.6M | $21.3M |
| Net Profit | $-9.8M | $-85.6M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | -40.0% | -291.6% |
| Net Margin | -38.2% | -401.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -31.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -216.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.6M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.9M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $-41.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $760.0K | $-30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $-41.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $-43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $-41.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.0% | -42.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.0% | -171.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -40.0% | -291.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.0% | -86.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -67.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.0% | -112.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | -210.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.3% | -435.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -38.2% | -401.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.5% | -130.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | -108.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -54.4% | -293.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.3% | -374.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.0% | -570.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.70 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.77 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.96 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.6M | $63.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | $174.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $115.9M | $346.8M |
| Total Assets | $144.6M | $703.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.6M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $102.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $133.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.8M | $13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.1M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.5M | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $0 | $174.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $175.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | — |
| Q4 25 | $115.9M | $346.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.5M | $423.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.3M | $463.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.1M | $318.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.4M | $377.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $144.6M | $703.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.0M | $756.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.8M | $782.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.0M | $659.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.1M | $-34.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-17.6M | $-39.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -68.6% | -184.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.7% | 23.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-33.0M | $-93.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.1M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.7M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $-23.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-17.6M | $-39.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.2M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.1M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $-23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -68.6% | -184.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.3% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.7% | -44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | -164.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -39.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | -206.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.4% | -349.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -46.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEOS
| Energy Solutions | $14.6M | 57% |
| Smart Water | $5.8M | 22% |
| Intelligent Industrial | $5.1M | 20% |
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |