vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP (GEOS) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $25.6M, roughly 2.0× GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP). GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP runs the higher net margin — -38.2% vs -106.3%, a 68.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.4% vs -31.3%). Over the past eight quarters, GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Geospace Technologies Corporation is a manufacturer of specialized electronics and seismic data acquisition equipment used in the oil and gas industry. Geospace Technologies has been publicly traded on the NASDAQ stock exchange since November 1997.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
GEOS vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.6M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-9.8M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -40.0% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -38.2% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -31.3% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -216.6% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.2M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.4M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.9M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3M | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $760.0K | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.3M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -40.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.0% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.5% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -54.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.3% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.8% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.70 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.77 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.65 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.96 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.32 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $115.9M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $144.6M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | — |
| Q4 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.5M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.3M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.1M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.7M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.6M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.4M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.2M | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.1M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-17.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -68.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-33.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.7M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.5M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.9M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-17.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -68.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -39.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -46.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.37× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEOS
| Energy Solutions | $14.6M | 57% |
| Smart Water | $5.8M | 22% |
| Intelligent Industrial | $5.1M | 20% |
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.
