vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GERON CORP (GERN) and Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GERON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.2M vs $37.8M, roughly 1.2× Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.). Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -39.0%, a 39.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GERON CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (67.1% vs 28.8%).
Geron Corporation is a biotechnology company located in Foster City, California which specializes in developing and commercializing therapeutic products for cancer that inhibit telomerase.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
GERN vs NP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.2M | $37.8M |
| Net Profit | $-18.4M | $50.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -29.4% | — |
| Net Margin | -39.0% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 67.1% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.3% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.3M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $882.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $304.0K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $23.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-67.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-55.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.4% | 46.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -99.8% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7860.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18465.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -39.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -93.5% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7639.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18220.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $78.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $567.4M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.1M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $70.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.7M | $-509.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $259.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $292.3M | $-374.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $344.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $247.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $567.4M | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $562.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $444.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $449.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $394.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-13.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.6M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-58.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-167.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-168.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6086.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20680.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -732926.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 202.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 3608.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
