vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) and KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gevo, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($45.3M vs $25.8M, roughly 1.8× KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.). Gevo, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -101.7%, a 88.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gevo, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (695.6% vs -26.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Gevo, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (237.1% CAGR vs -18.8%).
Gevo, Inc. is an American renewable chemicals and advanced biofuels company headquartered in unincorporated Douglas County, Colorado, in the Denver-Aurora metropolitan area. Gevo operates in the sustainability sector, pursuing a business model based on the concept of the "circular economy". The company develops bio-based alternatives to petroleum-based products using a combination of biotechnology and classical chemistry. Gevo uses the GREET model from Argonne National Laboratory as a basis f...
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is a specialized real estate finance firm sponsored by global investment firm KKR. It primarily originates, acquires, and manages a portfolio of senior secured commercial real estate loans, mostly backed by high-quality institutional commercial properties across the United States, delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors via interest income from its diversified assets.
GEVO vs KREF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $45.3M | $25.8M |
| Net Profit | $-6.0M | $-26.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.8% | -105.1% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -101.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 695.6% | -26.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.9% | -229.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $45.3M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.1M | $31.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $39.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.0M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.6M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.2M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.9M | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | -105.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.6% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | -101.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.2% | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -344.7% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1221.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -456.8% | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -580.0% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | -98.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -74.6% | -15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.9% | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1076.6% | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -399.3% | 63.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -473.1% | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $81.2M | $84.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $164.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $466.3M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $718.9M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $81.2M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.6M | $204.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $107.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.3M | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.4M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $223.2M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.7M | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $270.6M | $106.5M |
| Q4 25 | $164.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $466.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $468.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $469.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $489.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $504.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $541.9M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $718.9M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $685.2M | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $702.1M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.8M | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $583.9M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $583.9M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.9M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $633.6M | $7.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.13× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $72.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 24.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-43.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $72.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.8M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $132.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.0M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.4M | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.1M | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-29.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-20.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-33.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -34.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -102.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -587.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1057.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -392.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -841.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 256.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 496.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 174.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 438.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
