vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRIFFON CORP (GFF) and HELEN OF TROY LTD (HELE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRIFFON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($649.1M vs $512.8M, roughly 1.3× HELEN OF TROY LTD). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -16.4%, a 26.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRIFFON CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -3.4%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $5.8M). Over the past eight quarters, HELEN OF TROY LTD's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
Helen of Troy Limited is an American publicly traded designer, developer and worldwide marketer of consumer brand-name housewares, health and home, and beauty products under owned and licensed brands. It is the parent corporation of OXO International Ltd., Kaz, Inc., Steel Technology, LLC, and Idelle Labs, Ltd, among others. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda, with U.S. operations headquartered in El Paso, Texas. The company is named after the mythic figure Helen of Troy.
GFF vs HELE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $649.1M | $512.8M |
| Net Profit | $64.4M | $-84.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.1% | 46.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | -1.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | -3.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | -269.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.41 | $-3.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $512.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $662.2M | $431.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $613.6M | $371.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $611.7M | $485.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $632.4M | $530.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.7M | $474.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.8M | $416.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.9M | $489.2M |
| Q4 25 | $64.4M | $-84.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $-308.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-120.1M | $-450.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.8M | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $49.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.5M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.1M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.1M | $42.7M |
| Q4 25 | 41.1% | 46.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.2% | 47.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.2% | 48.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.9% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | 49.0% |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | -73.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.5% | -109.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | -16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | -71.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | -121.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.41 | $-3.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.04 | $-13.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.65 | $-19.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.21 | $2.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | $2.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.28 | $1.76 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | $27.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.9M | $852.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.3M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.8M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.0M | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.5M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $18.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $921.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $672.0M |
| Q4 25 | $108.9M | $852.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $926.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.2M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.16× | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.74× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.84× | 0.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.0M | $11.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.3M | $5.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.3% | 1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $278.9M | $55.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.0M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.1M | $58.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.9M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $44.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | $73.6M |
| Q4 25 | $99.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.4M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.5M | $191.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $39.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.5M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $66.6M |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 0.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 2.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | 4.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 1.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
HELE
| Beauty Wellness | $283.2M | 55% |
| Home Outdoor | $229.6M | 45% |
