vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRIFFON CORP (GFF) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Natera, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($665.5M vs $649.1M, roughly 1.0× GRIFFON CORP). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 7.1%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs 2.6%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $37.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Natera, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
GFF vs NTRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $649.1M | $665.5M |
| Net Profit | $64.4M | $47.3M |
| Gross Margin | 41.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | -3.4% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 39.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 187.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.41 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $665.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $662.2M | $592.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $613.6M | $546.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $611.7M | $501.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $632.4M | $476.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.7M | $439.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.8M | $413.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.9M | $367.7M |
| Q4 25 | $64.4M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-120.1M | $-100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.8M | $-66.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.5M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.1M | $-37.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.1M | $-67.6M |
| Q4 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.5% | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | -13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | -20.2% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.41 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.04 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.65 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.21 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.28 | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.9M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.8M | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.0M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.5M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $878.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.5M | $836.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.2M | $794.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.74× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.84× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.0M | $73.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.3M | $37.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.3% | 5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 1.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $278.9M | $109.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.0M | $59.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.1M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.9M | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | $27.0M |
| Q4 25 | $99.3M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.5M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.5M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
NTRA
Segment breakdown not available.