vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRIFFON CORP (GFF) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $649.1M, roughly 1.7× GRIFFON CORP). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs 9.9%, a 13.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs 2.6%). Teradyne produced more free cash flow last quarter ($218.8M vs $99.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
GFF vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $649.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $64.4M | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | 41.1% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.41 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $662.2M | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $613.6M | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $611.7M | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $632.4M | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.7M | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.8M | $729.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.9M | $599.8M |
| Q4 25 | $64.4M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-120.1M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.8M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.5M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.1M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.1M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | 41.1% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.2% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.2% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.9% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | 56.6% |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.41 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.04 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.65 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.21 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.28 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.9M | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.3M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.8M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.0M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.5M | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $707.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.7M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.8M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.2M | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.74× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.84× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.0M | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.3M | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.3% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $278.9M | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.1M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.9M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $99.3M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.4M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.5M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.5M | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $-36.7M |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
