vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GOLD FIELDS LTD (GFI) and United Rentals (URI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GOLD FIELDS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $4.0B, roughly 1.3× United Rentals). GOLD FIELDS LTD runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs 13.3%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GOLD FIELDS LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 7.2%). United Rentals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $423.6M).
Gold Fields Limited is one of the world's largest gold mining firms. Headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, the company is listed on both the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The firm was formed in 1998 with the amalgamation of the gold assets of Gold Fields of South Africa Limited and Gencor Limited. The company traces its roots back to 1887, when Cecil Rhodes founded Gold Fields of South Africa Limited. As of 2019, Gold Fields was the world's e...
United Rentals, Inc. is an American equipment rental company, with about 16 percent of the North American market share as of 2022. It owns the largest rental fleet in the world with approximately 4,800 classes of equipment totaling about $20.59 billion in original equipment cost (OEC) as of 2025. The company has a combined total of 1,625 locations, including an integrated network of 1,504 rental locations in North America, 38 in Europe, 23 in Australia and 19 in New Zealand.
GFI vs URI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $4.0B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $531.0M |
| Gross Margin | 45.3% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.8% |
| Net Margin | 24.8% | 13.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.6% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 77.7% | 2.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.38 | $8.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $992.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $938.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $872.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $893.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $874.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $870.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $531.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $653.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $701.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $622.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $518.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $689.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $708.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $636.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 65.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 58.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.8% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.43 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.38 | $10.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $860.2M | $156.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $13.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $29.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.46× | 1.55× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $156.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $459.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $512.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $548.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $542.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.2M | $457.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $479.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $467.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $29.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $29.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1B | $28.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $423.6M | $1.1B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.1% | 26.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 22.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.25× | 2.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $423.6M | $471.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-168.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-263.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 46.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -30.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 56.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 157.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 175.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.85× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.25× | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFI
Segment breakdown not available.
URI
| Equipment rentals | $3.4B | 86% |
| Sales of rental equipment | $350.0M | 9% |
| Service and other revenues | $92.0M | 2% |
| Sales of new equipment | $84.0M | 2% |
| Contractor supplies sales | $40.0M | 1% |
