vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) and TECK RESOURCES LTD (TECK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TECK RESOURCES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3B vs $4.9B, roughly 1.3× GFL Environmental Inc.).
GFL Environmental Inc. is an American-Canadian waste management company founded in Vaughan, Ontario, with headquarters in Miami Beach, Florida. Founded in 2007, GFL operates in all provinces in Canada and much of the United States, and currently employs more than 20,000 people. The company provides environmental services to municipal, residential, commercial, industrial and institutional customers.
Teck Resources Limited is a diversified natural resources company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, that is engaged in mining and mineral development, including coal for the steelmaking industry, copper, zinc, and energy. Secondary products include lead, silver, gold, molybdenum, germanium, indium and cadmium. Teck Resources was formed from the amalgamation of Teck and Cominco in 2001.
GFL vs TECK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9B | $6.3B |
| Net Profit | $-686.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $3.8B |
| Q3 25 | $-686.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-727.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-195.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-217.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q3 25 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
