vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) and TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.0M vs $13.2M, roughly 1.1× TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.). Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP runs the higher net margin — -38.9% vs -73.9%, a 34.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (59.8% vs -33.6%). Over the past eight quarters, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (43.0% CAGR vs -18.1%).
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is a publicly traded real estate investment partnership focused on acquiring, owning, and managing affordable and workforce multifamily housing properties across the United States. It prioritizes investments that generate stable long-term returns while expanding housing access for low and middle income communities.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on advancing immuno-oncology and interventional oncology solutions. It develops proprietary targeted drug delivery technologies designed to improve treatment efficacy for patients with liver, pancreatic and other hard-to-treat solid tumors, primarily operating in North American markets via partnerships with clinical care and research institutions.
GHI vs TLSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.0M | $13.2M |
| Net Profit | $-5.8M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | -33.4% | -24.8% |
| Net Margin | -38.9% | -73.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.6% | 59.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -157.6% | 3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.31 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.3M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.4M | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.8M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.1M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 86.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 83.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.0% |
| Q4 25 | -33.4% | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -77.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | -65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | -79.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.0% | -91.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | -118.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | -111.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.6% | -180.8% |
| Q4 25 | -38.9% | -73.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -93.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | -73.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | -113.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.9% | -122.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.6% | -204.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $-0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-33.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $35.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $39.5M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.4M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.0M | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-36.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $17.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $37.5M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-19.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.5M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -66.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -57.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -69.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -149.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -183.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -169.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
