vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of G III APPAREL GROUP LTD (GIII) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

G III APPAREL GROUP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($988.6M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.8× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 8.2%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, G III APPAREL GROUP LTD's revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 3.8%).

G III Apparel Group is a global fashion company that designs, sources, manufactures, markets and distributes apparel, footwear, and accessories under a range of owned and licensed well-known brands. It serves department stores, specialty retailers, and e-commerce platforms across North America, Europe, and other key global markets, catering to casual, sportswear, and premium fashion consumer segments.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

GIII vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GIII
GIII
1.8× larger
GIII
$988.6M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+12.3% gap
KIM
3.2%
-9.0%
GIII
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
19.7% more per $
KIM
27.9%
8.2%
GIII
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GIII
GIII
Annualised
GIII
13.7%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$988.6M
$542.5M
Net Profit
$80.6M
$151.2M
Gross Margin
38.6%
Operating Margin
11.4%
36.4%
Net Margin
8.2%
27.9%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-29.8%
-9.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.84

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$988.6M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$613.3M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$583.6M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$839.5M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$525.4M
Q3 24
$644.8M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$609.7M
$500.2M
Q1 24
$764.8M
$503.8M
Net Profit
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$80.6M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$10.9M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$7.8M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$48.8M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$114.8M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$24.2M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$5.8M
$119.7M
Q1 24
$28.9M
$-11.0M
Gross Margin
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
38.6%
Q3 25
40.8%
Q2 25
42.2%
Q1 25
39.5%
Q4 24
39.8%
Q3 24
42.8%
Q2 24
42.5%
Q1 24
36.9%
Operating Margin
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
11.4%
36.4%
Q3 25
2.7%
34.9%
Q2 25
1.5%
39.2%
Q1 25
8.5%
33.6%
Q4 24
15.3%
31.7%
Q3 24
6.4%
33.7%
Q2 24
2.2%
32.1%
Q1 24
6.1%
25.9%
Net Margin
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
8.2%
27.9%
Q3 25
1.8%
25.7%
Q2 25
1.3%
31.0%
Q1 25
5.8%
24.8%
Q4 24
10.6%
31.6%
Q3 24
3.8%
26.8%
Q2 24
1.0%
23.9%
Q1 24
3.8%
-2.2%
EPS (diluted)
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$1.84
Q3 25
$0.25
Q2 25
$0.17
Q1 25
$1.00
Q4 24
$2.55
Q3 24
$0.53
Q2 24
$0.12
Q1 24
$0.59

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$184.1M
$211.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$6.5M
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$2.8B
$19.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$184.1M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$301.8M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$257.8M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$181.4M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$104.7M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$414.8M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$508.4M
$126.4M
Q1 24
$507.8M
$133.4M
Total Debt
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$6.5M
$7.7B
Q3 25
$6.9M
Q2 25
$6.8M
Q1 25
$3.0M
Q4 24
$213.9M
$8.0B
Q3 24
$402.5M
Q2 24
$402.7M
Q1 24
$402.8M
Stockholders' Equity
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$1.8B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$10.6B
Q1 24
$1.6B
$10.6B
Total Assets
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$2.8B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$2.4B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$2.5B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$2.8B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$2.7B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$2.6B
$19.5B
Q1 24
$2.7B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
0.00×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
0.00×
Q1 25
0.00×
Q4 24
0.13×
0.75×
Q3 24
0.27×
Q2 24
0.26×
Q1 24
0.26×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-97.3M
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-106.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-10.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.9%
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-1.21×
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$367.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$-97.3M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$75.1M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$93.8M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$333.4M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$-111.8M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$49.3M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$45.5M
$294.1M
Q1 24
$361.3M
$176.1M
Free Cash Flow
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$-106.4M
Q3 25
$64.7M
Q2 25
$85.7M
Q1 25
$323.7M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$-120.3M
Q3 24
$38.8M
Q2 24
$32.8M
Q1 24
$352.3M
FCF Margin
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
-10.8%
Q3 25
10.6%
Q2 25
14.7%
Q1 25
38.6%
38.3%
Q4 24
-11.1%
Q3 24
6.0%
Q2 24
5.4%
Q1 24
46.1%
Capex Intensity
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
0.9%
0.0%
Q3 25
1.7%
0.0%
Q2 25
1.4%
0.0%
Q1 25
1.2%
3.4%
Q4 24
0.8%
Q3 24
1.6%
Q2 24
2.1%
Q1 24
1.2%
Cash Conversion
GIII
GIII
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
-1.21×
1.71×
Q3 25
6.86×
2.41×
Q2 25
12.09×
1.87×
Q1 25
6.83×
1.69×
Q4 24
-0.97×
1.44×
Q3 24
2.04×
2.18×
Q2 24
7.84×
2.46×
Q1 24
12.52×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GIII
GIII

Proprietary Brands$498.1M50%
Licensed Brands$479.2M48%
Retail Segment$45.7M5%

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons