vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GCI Liberty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.0M vs $152.7M, roughly 1.7× GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD). GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -150.6%, a 154.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.

GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.

GILT vs GLIBA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GLIBA
GLIBA
1.7× larger
GLIBA
$257.0M
$152.7M
GILT
Higher net margin
GILT
GILT
154.7% more per $
GILT
4.1%
-150.6%
GLIBA

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Revenue
$152.7M
$257.0M
Net Profit
$6.3M
$-387.0M
Gross Margin
35.8%
Operating Margin
5.4%
-189.9%
Net Margin
4.1%
-150.6%
Revenue YoY
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$57016808.00
$-13.34

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$257.0M
Q2 25
$152.7M
$261.0M
Q2 24
$126.6M
Q2 23
$106.9M
Q2 22
$98.2M
Net Profit
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$-387.0M
Q2 25
$6.3M
$27.0M
Q2 24
$9.9M
Q2 23
$-2.0M
Q2 22
$-5.2M
Gross Margin
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
Q2 25
35.8%
Q2 24
39.7%
Q2 23
33.8%
Q2 22
29.6%
Operating Margin
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
-189.9%
Q2 25
5.4%
19.5%
Q2 24
9.8%
Q2 23
0.4%
Q2 22
-4.0%
Net Margin
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
-150.6%
Q2 25
4.1%
10.3%
Q2 24
7.8%
Q2 23
-1.9%
Q2 22
-5.3%
EPS (diluted)
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$-13.34
Q2 25
$57016808.00
Q2 24
$56622204.00
Q2 23
Q2 22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$64.9M
$124.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$56.5M
$985.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$315.8M
$1.4B
Total Assets
$575.9M
$3.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.18×
0.72×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$124.0M
Q2 25
$64.9M
$104.0M
Q2 24
$93.7M
Q2 23
$87.4M
Q2 22
$70.1M
Total Debt
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$985.0M
Q2 25
$56.5M
$987.0M
Q2 24
$2.0M
Q2 23
Q2 22
Stockholders' Equity
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$1.4B
Q2 25
$315.8M
Q2 24
$282.8M
Q2 23
$255.0M
Q2 22
$245.7M
Total Assets
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$3.0B
Q2 25
$575.9M
$3.4B
Q2 24
$416.9M
Q2 23
$371.6M
Q2 22
$376.0M
Debt / Equity
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
0.72×
Q2 25
0.18×
Q2 24
0.01×
Q2 23
Q2 22

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$76.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$21.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
21.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$76.0M
Q2 25
$226.0M
Q2 24
$8.2M
Q2 23
Q2 22
Free Cash Flow
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
$21.0M
Q2 25
$107.0M
Q2 24
$1.7M
Q2 23
Q2 22
FCF Margin
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
8.2%
Q2 25
41.0%
Q2 24
1.3%
Q2 23
Q2 22
Capex Intensity
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
21.4%
Q2 25
45.6%
Q2 24
5.2%
Q2 23
Q2 22
Cash Conversion
GILT
GILT
GLIBA
GLIBA
Q3 25
Q2 25
8.37×
Q2 24
0.83×
Q2 23
Q2 22

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons