vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and HCI Group, Inc. (HCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HCI Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($246.2M vs $152.7M, roughly 1.6× GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD). HCI Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 39.7% vs 4.1%, a 35.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
HCI Equity Partners is a Washington, DC–based private equity firm with an additional office in Chicago, Illinois.
GILT vs HCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.7M | $246.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | $97.7M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 58.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 39.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 52.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 3679.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $57016808.00 | $7.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $246.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | $221.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $216.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $161.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $175.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $206.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $206.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $97.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $66.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $54.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 42.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | $57016808.00 | $5.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $56622204.00 | $4.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $315.8M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $575.9M | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $987.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $947.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $754.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $532.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $518.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | $445.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $655.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $821.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.8M | $758.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $522.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $453.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $455.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.8M | $447.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $395.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $444.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $440.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 179.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $771.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $444.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $145.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $331.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $-29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $182.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $144.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $160.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $327.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $103.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $181.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 179.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 202.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | -14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 128.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | -0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GILT
Segment breakdown not available.
HCI
| Insurance Operation | $218.3M | 89% |
| Reciprocal Exchange Operation | $27.0M | 11% |
