vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and Opera Ltd (OPRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.7M vs $142.7M, roughly 1.1× Opera Ltd). Opera Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 4.1%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
Opera is a multinational technology corporation headquartered in Oslo, Norway, with additional offices in Europe, China, and Africa. Opera offers a range of products and services that include PC and mobile web browsers, GameMaker and gaming portals, the Opera News content recommendation products, the Opera Ads platform, and a number of Web3 and e-commerce products and services. The company's total user base is 296 million monthly active users.
GILT vs OPRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.7M | $142.7M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | $18.3M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $57016808.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $211.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | $106.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $98.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-5.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 29.6% | — |
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -4.0% | — |
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -5.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | $57016808.00 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56622204.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $315.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $575.9M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $87.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $70.1M | — |
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $315.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $255.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $245.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | $575.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $371.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $376.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
