vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T1 Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $152.7M, roughly 1.4× GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD). GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -62.0%, a 66.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
GILT vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.7M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $57016808.00 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 23 | $106.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $98.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-28.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-5.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 29.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -4.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -5.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $57016808.00 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $56622204.00 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.5M | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $315.8M | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $575.9M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $249.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $87.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $70.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.8M | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.8M | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $582.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $255.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $245.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.9M | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $670.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $371.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $376.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-37.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -138.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GILT
Segment breakdown not available.
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
