vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of General Mills (GIS) and Trane Technologies (TT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Trane Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.0B vs $4.9B, roughly 1.0× General Mills). Trane Technologies runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs 8.5%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trane Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.0% vs -7.2%). General Mills produced more free cash flow last quarter ($675.7M vs $573.0M). Over the past eight quarters, General Mills's revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -3.2%).

General Mills, Inc. is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of branded consumer foods sold through retail stores. Founded on the banks of the Mississippi River at Saint Anthony Falls in Minneapolis, the company originally gained fame for being a large flour miller. It is headquartered in Golden Valley, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis.

Trane Technologies plc is an Irish domiciled company focused on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration systems. The company traces its corporate history back more than 150 years and was created after a series of mergers and spin-offs. In 2008, HVAC manufacturer Trane was acquired by Ingersoll Rand, a US industrial tools manufacturer. In 2020, the tools business was spun off as Ingersoll Rand and the remaining company was renamed Trane Technologies.

GIS vs TT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TT
TT
1.0× larger
TT
$5.0B
$4.9B
GIS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TT
TT
+13.2% gap
TT
6.0%
-7.2%
GIS
Higher net margin
TT
TT
3.4% more per $
TT
11.9%
8.5%
GIS
More free cash flow
GIS
GIS
$102.7M more FCF
GIS
$675.7M
$573.0M
TT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GIS
GIS
Annualised
GIS
-2.4%
-3.2%
TT

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Revenue
$4.9B
$5.0B
Net Profit
$413.0M
$589.5M
Gross Margin
34.8%
165.2%
Operating Margin
15.0%
15.6%
Net Margin
8.5%
11.9%
Revenue YoY
-7.2%
6.0%
Net Profit YoY
-48.1%
-3.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.78

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
$5.0B
Q4 25
$4.9B
$5.1B
Q3 25
$4.5B
$5.7B
Q2 25
$4.6B
$5.7B
Q1 25
$4.8B
$4.7B
Q4 24
$5.2B
$4.9B
Q3 24
$4.8B
$5.4B
Q2 24
$4.7B
$5.3B
Net Profit
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
$589.5M
Q4 25
$413.0M
$591.3M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$847.6M
Q2 25
$294.0M
$874.8M
Q1 25
$625.6M
$604.9M
Q4 24
$795.7M
$604.3M
Q3 24
$579.9M
$772.0M
Q2 24
$557.5M
$755.3M
Gross Margin
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
165.2%
Q4 25
34.8%
Q3 25
33.9%
36.9%
Q2 25
32.4%
37.6%
Q1 25
33.9%
35.8%
Q4 24
36.9%
Q3 24
34.8%
36.3%
Q2 24
35.8%
36.5%
Operating Margin
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
15.6%
Q4 25
15.0%
15.9%
Q3 25
38.2%
20.3%
Q2 25
11.1%
20.3%
Q1 25
18.4%
17.5%
Q4 24
20.6%
16.6%
Q3 24
17.2%
18.8%
Q2 24
16.5%
19.5%
Net Margin
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
11.9%
Q4 25
8.5%
11.5%
Q3 25
26.7%
14.8%
Q2 25
6.5%
15.2%
Q1 25
12.9%
12.9%
Q4 24
15.2%
12.4%
Q3 24
12.0%
14.2%
Q2 24
11.8%
14.2%
EPS (diluted)
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.78
$2.64
Q3 25
$2.22
$3.78
Q2 25
$0.53
$3.89
Q1 25
$1.12
$2.67
Q4 24
$1.42
$2.65
Q3 24
$1.03
$3.39
Q2 24
$0.98
$3.30

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$683.4M
$1.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$12.2B
$4.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$9.3B
$8.6B
Total Assets
$32.5B
$22.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.31×
0.54×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$683.4M
$1.8B
Q3 25
$952.9M
Q2 25
$363.9M
Q1 25
$521.3M
Q4 24
$2.3B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$468.1M
Q2 24
$418.0M
Total Debt
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
$4.6B
Q4 25
$12.2B
$4.6B
Q3 25
$12.2B
Q2 25
$12.7B
Q1 25
$11.8B
Q4 24
$12.4B
$4.8B
Q3 24
$11.4B
Q2 24
$11.3B
Stockholders' Equity
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
$8.6B
Q4 25
$9.3B
$8.6B
Q3 25
$9.5B
$8.3B
Q2 25
$9.2B
$7.8B
Q1 25
$9.3B
$7.5B
Q4 24
$9.2B
$7.5B
Q3 24
$9.3B
$7.6B
Q2 24
$9.4B
$6.9B
Total Assets
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
$22.8B
Q4 25
$32.5B
$21.4B
Q3 25
$33.0B
$21.4B
Q2 25
$33.1B
$21.0B
Q1 25
$32.7B
$20.1B
Q4 24
$33.4B
$20.1B
Q3 24
$31.8B
$20.9B
Q2 24
$31.5B
$20.2B
Debt / Equity
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
0.54×
Q4 25
1.31×
0.54×
Q3 25
1.29×
Q2 25
1.38×
Q1 25
1.28×
Q4 24
1.35×
0.64×
Q3 24
1.23×
Q2 24
1.20×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$819.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$675.7M
$573.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.9%
11.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.0%
1.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.98×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.8B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$819.3M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$397.0M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$611.6M
$692.1M
Q1 25
$531.9M
$339.5M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$899.9M
Q3 24
$624.2M
$1.3B
Q2 24
$863.7M
$695.9M
Free Cash Flow
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
$573.0M
Q4 25
$675.7M
Q3 25
$287.5M
$935.6M
Q2 25
$391.4M
$602.2M
Q1 25
$428.0M
$220.6M
Q4 24
$989.6M
$774.3M
Q3 24
$483.9M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$575.2M
$623.0M
FCF Margin
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
11.5%
Q4 25
13.9%
Q3 25
6.4%
16.3%
Q2 25
8.6%
10.5%
Q1 25
8.8%
4.7%
Q4 24
18.9%
15.9%
Q3 24
10.0%
22.3%
Q2 24
12.2%
11.7%
Capex Intensity
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
1.6%
Q4 25
3.0%
Q3 25
2.4%
1.2%
Q2 25
4.8%
1.6%
Q1 25
2.1%
2.5%
Q4 24
3.1%
2.6%
Q3 24
2.9%
1.6%
Q2 24
6.1%
1.4%
Cash Conversion
GIS
GIS
TT
TT
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.98×
1.96×
Q3 25
0.33×
1.18×
Q2 25
2.08×
0.79×
Q1 25
0.85×
0.56×
Q4 24
1.45×
1.49×
Q3 24
1.08×
1.69×
Q2 24
1.55×
0.92×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GIS
GIS

Snacks$1.0B21%
Convenient Meals$827.0M17%
Cereal$791.2M16%
Dough$720.9M15%
Pet$698.7M14%
Baking Mixes And Ingredients$556.0M11%
Super Premium Ice Cream$175.8M4%
Other Product$73.3M2%

TT
TT

Americas$4.0B80%
EMEA$639.5M13%
Asia Pacific$331.5M7%

Related Comparisons