vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.1× Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 0.7%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs -16.5%). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.3M vs $3.4M).
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
GLDD vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.5M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $12.6M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.9% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $256.5M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.8M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.9M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.6M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $378.2M | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $517.1M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $378.2M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $517.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $502.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.9M | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.0M | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $79.7M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.3M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.31× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.5M | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.87× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
