vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD) and Samsara Inc. (IOT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Samsara Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($444.3M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.7× Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP). Samsara Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 4.9%, a 0.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Samsara Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs 26.5%). Samsara Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($61.7M vs $50.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Samsara Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 13.6%).
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
Samsara Inc. is an American IoT company headquartered in San Francisco, California, that provides telematics software and insights for physical operations. The company has customers across North America and Europe. Samsara developed a connected operations cloud platform that provides insights to physical operations organizations in the transportation, construction, energy, utilities, public sector and retail industries, and supports the safety and efficiency of those operations.
GLDD vs IOT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.5M | $444.3M |
| Net Profit | $12.6M | $22.0M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.9% | 341.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 26 | — | $444.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $256.5M | $416.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.2M | $391.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.8M | $366.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.9M | $346.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | $322.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $300.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | $280.7M |
| Q4 26 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | $-37.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $-49.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $-56.3M |
| Q4 26 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | 76.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | 76.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | 77.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 76.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | 75.6% |
| Q4 26 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | -14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | -19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -23.5% |
| Q4 26 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | -11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | -20.1% |
| Q4 26 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $833.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $378.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $517.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 26 | — | $833.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $275.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $258.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $259.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $227.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $160.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $162.5M |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $378.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $517.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $502.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.9M | $999.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.4M | $964.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.0M | $923.9M |
| Q4 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $79.7M | $69.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.3M | $61.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.31× | 3.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.5M | $207.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 26 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | $63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.2M | $50.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9M | $52.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | $53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | $36.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $23.7M |
| Q4 26 | — | $61.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $44.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $48.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | $18.6M |
| Q4 26 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | 6.6% |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 1.8% |
| Q4 26 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | 8.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
