vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.5M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.3× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 4.9%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 20.2%). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.3M vs $-11.6M).
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
GLDD vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.5M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $12.6M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.9% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $256.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $378.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $517.1M | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $378.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $517.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $502.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $79.7M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.3M | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.31× | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLDD
Segment breakdown not available.
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
