vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD) and New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
New Fortress Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($326.2M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.3× Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs -259.7%, a 264.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs -7.0%). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.3M vs $-134.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.6% CAGR vs -26.8%).
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
New Fortress Energy Inc. is a global energy infrastructure firm developing, owning and operating LNG import/export terminals, natural gas supply networks and low-carbon projects. It serves utility, industrial and public sector clients across the Americas and Caribbean, delivering affordable, lower-emission energy resources.
GLDD vs NFE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.5M | $326.2M |
| Net Profit | $12.6M | $-847.1M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | -193.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | -259.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | -7.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.9% | -277.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-3.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $256.5M | $326.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.2M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.8M | $228.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.9M | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $446.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | $291.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.7M | $609.5M |
| Q4 25 | $12.6M | $-847.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $-263.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $-546.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $-175.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | $-224.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.0M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 62.4% |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | -193.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | -37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -170.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.8% | 30.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -259.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -109.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -239.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -45.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | -64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | -30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $-3.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-1.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $226.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $378.2M | $8.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $517.1M | $182.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | 44.78× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $226.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $145.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $551.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $447.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $90.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | $143.5M |
| Q4 25 | $378.2M | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.2M | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $517.1M | $182.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $502.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.0M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $10.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | 44.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | 4.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $79.7M | $-76.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.3M | $-134.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | -41.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 18.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.5M | $-1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | $-76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.2M | $-171.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9M | $-329.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | $445.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $113.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | $-134.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $-231.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-726.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $-262.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | $-210.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-367.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | $-493.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | $-457.9M |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | -41.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | -96.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | -318.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | -68.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | -60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | -169.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | -75.1% |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 174.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 66.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 187.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 208.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 85.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.02× | -2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.83× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
