vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD) and POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.2M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.2× Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP). POTLATCHDELTIC CORP runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 4.9%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 23.1%). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.3M vs $50.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.6% CAGR vs 11.1%).
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
GLDD vs PCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.5M | $314.2M |
| Net Profit | $12.6M | $25.9M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | 23.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.9% | 682.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $256.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.2M | $314.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.8M | $275.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.9M | $268.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | $320.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.7M | $228.1M |
| Q4 25 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.0M | $-305.0K |
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.8% | -2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $88.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $378.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $517.1M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $95.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $147.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $151.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $161.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $199.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | $180.2M |
| Q4 25 | $378.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $517.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $502.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.0M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $79.7M | $65.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.3M | $50.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | 15.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.31× | 2.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.5M | $132.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.2M | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9M | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | $49.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | $45.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $100.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.87× | 5.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.69× | 8.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.02× | 7.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | 7.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLDD
Segment breakdown not available.
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
