vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD) and Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($385.6M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.5× Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP). Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs 4.9%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.7% vs 26.5%). Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($402.6M vs $50.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.6% CAGR vs 13.6%).
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is a specialty property and casualty insurance provider offering tailored coverage solutions including commercial auto, general liability, professional indemnity, and specialty property policies. It primarily serves small-to-medium enterprises and niche industry segments across the United States, focusing on underwriting complex, hard-to-place risks for underserved client groups.
GLDD vs SKWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.5M | $385.6M |
| Net Profit | $12.6M | $43.2M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 14.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | 26.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.9% | 200.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $256.5M | $385.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.2M | $382.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.8M | $319.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.9M | $328.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | $304.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | $279.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.7M | $265.0M |
| Q4 25 | $12.6M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $38.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $42.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $36.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.0M | $36.8M |
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.8% | 17.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 13.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $168.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $378.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $517.1M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $168.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $160.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $136.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $121.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $105.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $378.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $517.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $502.1M | $961.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.9M | $899.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.9M | $850.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.9M | $794.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.4M | $797.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.0M | $723.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.0M | $692.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $79.7M | $408.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.3M | $402.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | 104.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.31× | 9.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.5M | $755.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | $408.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.2M | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9M | $88.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | $305.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $168.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $94.3M |
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | $402.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $87.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $96.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | $300.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $167.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | 104.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 98.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 55.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 35.5% |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | 9.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.87× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.69× | 21.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.02× | 4.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.83× | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
