vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and QUALYS, INC. (QLYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCI Liberty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.0M vs $175.3M, roughly 1.5× QUALYS, INC.). QUALYS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs -150.6%, a 180.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. QUALYS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($74.9M vs $21.0M).
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
Qualys, Inc. is an American technology firm based in Foster City, California, specializing in cloud security, compliance and related services.
GLIBA vs QLYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $175.3M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.4% |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | 33.6% |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | 30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 10.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 20.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | $169.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $164.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $159.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $153.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $148.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $145.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | $50.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $39.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 83.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 82.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 81.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | $1.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | $250.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $561.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | $225.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $194.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $290.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $232.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $281.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $273.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $561.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $529.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $508.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $498.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $477.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $449.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $427.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $404.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $999.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $996.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $973.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $908.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $876.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $861.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | $75.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $74.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 42.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $304.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $109.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $85.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $74.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $89.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $107.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $83.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 57.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLIBA
Segment breakdown not available.
QLYS
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $88.6M | 51% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $86.7M | 49% |
