vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCI Liberty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.0M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.9× STRATASYS LTD.). STRATASYS LTD. runs the higher net margin — -40.6% vs -150.6%, a 110.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. GCI Liberty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.0M vs $2.5M).
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
GLIBA vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $144.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $159.8M |
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-47.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-38.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 41.5% |
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -26.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -21.1% |
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -29.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -24.2% |
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.68 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $91.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $144.4M |
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $784.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $866.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $883.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $923.2M |
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-23.2M |
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $789.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-26.1M |
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -16.3% |
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 1.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
