vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and Wingstop Inc. (WING). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCI Liberty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.0M vs $183.7M, roughly 1.4× Wingstop Inc.). Wingstop Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs -150.6%, a 166.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
Wingstop Inc. is an American international fast food chain that primarily sells buffalo wings. Wingstop locations are decorated with a 1930s and 1940s pre-jet aviation theme.
GLIBA vs WING — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $183.7M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | $29.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.5% |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | 27.4% |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | $1.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $183.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $175.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $174.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $171.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $161.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $155.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 86.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 85.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.08 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | $128.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $648.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $128.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $196.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | $237.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $227.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $251.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $315.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $96.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-736.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $-702.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-686.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-715.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-675.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-447.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-437.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $648.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $693.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $721.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $708.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $696.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $716.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $484.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $451.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $61.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLIBA
Segment breakdown not available.
WING
| Royalty revenue, franchise fees and other | $87.5M | 48% |
| Advertising fees | $63.3M | 34% |
| Company-owned restaurant sales | $33.0M | 18% |