vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.7× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -116.9%, a 143.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
GLOO vs LARK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $18.8M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $5.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | 27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $148.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $136.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $139.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $128.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $439.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $354.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | 112.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
