vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and NaaS Technology Inc. (NAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $25.9M, roughly 1.3× NaaS Technology Inc.). Gloo Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -116.9% vs -193.3%, a 76.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
NaaS Technology Inc. is a leading electric vehicle energy service provider based in China. It delivers one-stop solutions covering charging network operation, software and hardware support for charging station operators, and value-added services such as charging location search and payment for EV owners, serving both enterprise and individual customers across domestic and select overseas markets.
GLOO vs NAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $25.9M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $-50.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | -144.2% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | -193.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 121.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | 18.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $24.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $-33.4M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $180.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $180.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $-25.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
NAAS
Segment breakdown not available.
