vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.3× Postal Realty Trust, Inc.). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -116.9%, a 134.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Postal Realty Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.6M vs $-63.4M).
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is a specialized real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages properties primarily leased to the United States Postal Service. Its portfolio includes last-mile postal facilities, sorting centers, and retail post office locations across the U.S., supporting critical mail and package delivery infrastructure.
GLOO vs PSTL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 21.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | 3.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $817.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $206.0K |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | $361.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $285.2M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $759.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $639.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $970.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | $361.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $347.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $328.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $273.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | $285.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $273.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $250.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $245.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $251.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $245.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $248.1M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | $759.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $735.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $689.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $654.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $615.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $608.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $584.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $44.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | $37.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | 144.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 26.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $65.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | 144.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 143.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
PSTL
Segment breakdown not available.
