vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and Pyxis Tankers Inc. (PXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $17.0M, roughly 1.9× Pyxis Tankers Inc.). Pyxis Tankers Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.3% vs -116.9%, a 148.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Pyxis Tankers Inc. is an international maritime transport enterprise specializing in seaborne shipping of refined petroleum products and other bulk liquid cargoes. It operates a fleet of modern product tankers, serving global energy markets, with core business covering major trade routes across the Atlantic, Mediterranean and Asia-Pacific regions.
GLOO vs PXS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2022
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $17.0M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | 37.2% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | 31.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | $67.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $54.9M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $138.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $67.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $54.9M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $138.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 1.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $2.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 0.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
PXS
Segment breakdown not available.
