vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pyxis Tankers Inc. (PXS) and OceanPal Inc. (SVRN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Pyxis Tankers Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.0M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.3× OceanPal Inc.). Pyxis Tankers Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.3% vs -62.9%, a 94.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Pyxis Tankers Inc. is an international maritime transport enterprise specializing in seaborne shipping of refined petroleum products and other bulk liquid cargoes. It operates a fleet of modern product tankers, serving global energy markets, with core business covering major trade routes across the Atlantic, Mediterranean and Asia-Pacific regions.
Ocean Software Limited was a British software development company that became one of the biggest European video game developers and publishers of the 1980s and 1990s.
PXS vs SVRN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.0M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-8.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | -62.3% |
| Net Margin | 31.3% | -62.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $32.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.3M | $7.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $67.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $54.9M | $84.4M |
| Total Assets | $138.1M | $89.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.3M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $67.3M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $84.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | $54.9M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $89.5M | ||
| Q3 22 | $138.1M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 1.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.4M | $-3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-22.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -169.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 142.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.45× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.4M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $-22.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 24 | — | -169.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 24 | — | 142.4% | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
