vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $284.8M, roughly 1.5× MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs 15.3%, a 41.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -29.1%).
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
GLPI vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $420.0M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $239.4M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 79.4% | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | 57.0% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.5% | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.0M | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $394.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.4M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $165.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 79.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.3% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.96 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.79 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $274.5M | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $13.8B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.56× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $239.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 275.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
