vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SM Energy Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($704.9M vs $420.0M, roughly 1.7× Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.). On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 5.0%).
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
GLPI vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $420.0M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $239.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 79.4% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 57.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.0M | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.6M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $394.9M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.2M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.6M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.3M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.6M | $634.6M |
| Q1 26 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.2M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.4M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $165.2M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.7M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.3M | $210.3M |
| Q1 26 | 79.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.8% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.5% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.4% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.1% | 44.0% |
| Q1 26 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.96 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.79 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $274.5M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $13.8B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $487.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8B | $6.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.4M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.5M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.4M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.1M | $476.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $239.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 275.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.94× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.53× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | 2.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
