vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Life360, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($146.0M vs $117.0M, roughly 1.2× Global Net Lease, Inc.). Life360, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 88.8% vs 41.2%, a 47.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life360, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.4% vs -15.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Life360, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (36.6% CAGR vs -11.1%).
Global Net Lease, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate assets under long-term net lease contracts. Its property portfolio spans North America and Europe, covering industrial, office, retail and other key sectors, serving tenants across multiple industries to deliver consistent long-term returns for shareholders.
Life360, Inc. develops family-focused safety and connectivity platforms. Core offerings include real-time location sharing, emergency alerts, driving behavior analysis tools and identity theft protection. It serves consumer markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, with most revenue from tiered premium subscription plans.
GNL vs LIF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $117.0M | $146.0M |
| Net Profit | $48.2M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 94.7% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | 41.2% | 88.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.1% | 26.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 838.7% | 1425.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $1.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | $146.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $124.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.9M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.4M | $103.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.8M | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.7M | $92.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.5M | $84.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.9M | $78.2M |
| Q4 25 | $48.2M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.1M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-189.4M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-65.6M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.7M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.8M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 76.7% |
| Q4 25 | 94.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.6% | -8.2% |
| Q4 25 | 41.2% | 88.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -49.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -143.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -47.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.5% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.1% | -12.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.14 | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.32 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.87 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $180.1M | $494.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $548.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $959.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $180.1M | $494.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.1M | $455.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.8M | $432.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.0M | $168.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.7M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $159.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $160.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.9M | $73.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $548.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $391.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $366.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $376.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $358.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $326.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $239.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $959.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $787.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $753.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | $455.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $441.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $427.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $405.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $318.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $222.8M | $36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $36.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.62× | 0.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $86.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $222.8M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.0M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.0M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.4M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.62× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GNL
| Industrial And Distribution Segment | $56.0M | 48% |
| Office Segment | $30.8M | 26% |
| Single Tenant Retail Segment | $30.2M | 26% |
LIF
Segment breakdown not available.
