vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC (GNW) and PLEXUS CORP (PLXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.5× PLEXUS CORP). PLEXUS CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 0.1%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Genworth Financial, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, is an American financial services company. It provides life insurance, long-term care insurance, mortgage insurance, and annuities.
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
GNW vs PLXS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $49.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.1% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 300.0% | 27.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $1.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.51 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $303.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $88.1B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $248.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $200.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 100.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 100.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GNW
| Enact Segment | $1.3B | 70% |
| Other | $386.0M | 22% |
| Annuities | $106.0M | 6% |
| Utilities | $20.0M | 1% |
| Consumer Cyclical | $17.0M | 1% |
| Energy | $4.0M | 0% |
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
