vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD) and KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. (KINS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.4M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.3× GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.2% vs 16.6%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs -3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.6% CAGR vs 6.3%).

Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.

Kingstone Companies, Inc., headquartered in Kingston, New York, provides property and casualty insurance products through its subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company. It places contracts with the third-party licensed premium finance company through its subsidiary Payments, Inc., a NYS licensed Insurance Premium Finance Company. Kingstone Insurance Company was ranked #1 of the 81 insurers rated by the Professional Insurance Agents Association in its 2010 Company Performance Survey. The company...

GOOD vs KINS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KINS
KINS
1.3× larger
KINS
$56.4M
$41.9M
GOOD
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KINS
KINS
+37.6% gap
KINS
34.0%
-3.6%
GOOD
Higher net margin
KINS
KINS
9.5% more per $
KINS
26.2%
16.6%
GOOD
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KINS
KINS
Annualised
KINS
25.6%
6.3%
GOOD

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Revenue
$41.9M
$56.4M
Net Profit
$7.0M
$14.8M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
160.2%
32.7%
Net Margin
16.6%
26.2%
Revenue YoY
-3.6%
34.0%
Net Profit YoY
29.5%
171.4%
EPS (diluted)
$1.09

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
$41.9M
Q4 25
$43.5M
$56.4M
Q3 25
$40.8M
$55.7M
Q2 25
$39.5M
$52.3M
Q1 25
$37.5M
$50.5M
Q4 24
$37.4M
$42.1M
Q3 24
$39.2M
$40.8M
Q2 24
$37.1M
$36.5M
Net Profit
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
$7.0M
Q4 25
$5.4M
$14.8M
Q3 25
$4.1M
$10.9M
Q2 25
$4.6M
$11.3M
Q1 25
$5.1M
$3.9M
Q4 24
$7.2M
$5.4M
Q3 24
$11.7M
$7.0M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$4.5M
Operating Margin
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
160.2%
Q4 25
32.7%
Q3 25
24.6%
Q2 25
27.1%
Q1 25
9.3%
Q4 24
15.9%
Q3 24
22.3%
Q2 24
15.7%
Net Margin
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
16.6%
Q4 25
12.4%
26.2%
Q3 25
10.1%
19.5%
Q2 25
11.7%
21.5%
Q1 25
13.7%
7.7%
Q4 24
19.2%
12.9%
Q3 24
29.8%
17.1%
Q2 24
4.3%
12.4%
EPS (diluted)
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.05
$1.09
Q3 25
$0.02
$0.74
Q2 25
$0.03
$0.78
Q1 25
$0.04
$0.27
Q4 24
$0.10
$0.44
Q3 24
$0.20
$0.55
Q2 24
$-0.04
$0.37

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$122.7M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$453.4M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.04×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$10.8M
Q3 25
$18.4M
Q2 25
$11.7M
Q1 25
$10.4M
Q4 24
$11.0M
Q3 24
$10.5M
Q2 24
$10.4M
Total Debt
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$843.5M
$4.4M
Q3 25
$843.3M
$4.8M
Q2 25
$794.4M
$5.1M
Q1 25
$740.7M
$5.4M
Q4 24
$693.4M
$11.2M
Q3 24
$692.6M
$17.3M
Q2 24
$722.5M
$25.3M
Stockholders' Equity
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$171.8M
$122.7M
Q3 25
$184.8M
$107.7M
Q2 25
$177.2M
$94.9M
Q1 25
$183.2M
$82.2M
Q4 24
$171.2M
$66.7M
Q3 24
$168.9M
$59.7M
Q2 24
$145.7M
$40.8M
Total Assets
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$453.4M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$428.6M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$393.4M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$385.4M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$374.9M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$347.0M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$319.8M
Debt / Equity
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.91×
0.04×
Q3 25
4.56×
0.04×
Q2 25
4.48×
0.05×
Q1 25
4.04×
0.07×
Q4 24
4.05×
0.17×
Q3 24
4.10×
0.29×
Q2 24
4.96×
0.62×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$75.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$73.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
129.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.14×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$124.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$88.2M
$75.9M
Q3 25
$18.9M
$25.9M
Q2 25
$35.8M
$9.3M
Q1 25
$17.7M
$17.9M
Q4 24
$57.0M
$57.9M
Q3 24
$5.5M
$21.7M
Q2 24
$13.6M
$7.1M
Free Cash Flow
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$73.1M
Q3 25
$25.3M
Q2 25
$8.7M
Q1 25
$17.0M
Q4 24
$55.6M
Q3 24
$21.0M
Q2 24
$6.6M
FCF Margin
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
129.5%
Q3 25
45.4%
Q2 25
16.6%
Q1 25
33.7%
Q4 24
132.1%
Q3 24
51.6%
Q2 24
18.1%
Capex Intensity
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.0%
Q3 25
1.2%
Q2 25
1.1%
Q1 25
1.7%
Q4 24
5.6%
Q3 24
1.7%
Q2 24
1.4%
Cash Conversion
GOOD
GOOD
KINS
KINS
Q1 26
Q4 25
16.38×
5.14×
Q3 25
4.57×
2.38×
Q2 25
7.74×
0.82×
Q1 25
3.44×
4.60×
Q4 24
7.93×
10.65×
Q3 24
0.47×
3.12×
Q2 24
8.44×
1.58×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons