vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD) and Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $37.8M, roughly 1.1× Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.). GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 16.6% vs 0.1%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs -3.6%).
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
GOOD vs NP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $37.8M |
| Net Profit | $7.0M | $50.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 160.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 16.6% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.6% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 29.5% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | $37.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.8M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.2M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $7.0M | $50.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | 160.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
