vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.0M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.2× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs -112.0%, a 149.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 20.6%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
GPUS vs OBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $33.0M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | $12.4M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | 37.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | 20.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | 73.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | 40.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.32 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $284.4M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $284.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $270.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $252.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $201.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $185.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0M | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $299.8M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.51× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | $43.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | $41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | 125.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | 7.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | $69.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.2M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.6M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | 125.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | 87.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | 120.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.3% | 7.9% |
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.75× | 0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
OBT
Segment breakdown not available.
