vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.0× ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC). ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — -72.1% vs -112.0%, a 39.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs -28.5%). ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-9.9M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-16.3% CAGR vs -29.7%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
GPUS vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.4% | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.32 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.9M | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $299.8M | $467.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.51× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.2M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.6M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.3% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
