vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Grab Holdings Ltd (GRAB) and RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD (RNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× Grab Holdings Ltd). RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs 1.8%, a 21.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Grab Holdings Inc. is a Singaporean multinational technology company headquartered in one-north, Singapore. It is the developer of a super-app for ride-hailing, food delivery, and digital payment services on mobile devices. It operates in Singapore, Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam.
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd is a Bermudian provider of reinsurance, insurance and other related business services. The company operates in reinsurance, insurance and ventures.
GRAB vs RNR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $26.0M | $515.8M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 23.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -36.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 72.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $6.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $760.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $916.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $835.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $-189.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $503.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-3.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.4B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $9.3B | $53.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $53.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3B | $50.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $591.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 22.73× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $157.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $591.0M | $778.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.