vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRAIL, Inc. (GRAL) and Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRAIL, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.6M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.3× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). Good Times Restaurants Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -227.5%, a 228.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRAIL, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -10.0%). Good Times Restaurants Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.2M vs $-63.9M). Over the past eight quarters, GRAIL, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.7% CAGR vs -0.7%).
GRAIL, Inc. is an American biotechnology company based in Menlo Park, California founded in 2015 seeking to develop an early cancer screening test for people who do not have symptoms. As a startup it was a subsidiary of Illumina, which bought it outright in 2021.
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
GRAL vs GTIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.6M | $32.7M |
| Net Profit | $-99.2M | $181.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -285.4% | 0.9% |
| Net Margin | -227.5% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.2% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.37 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $34.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.3M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.7M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.7M | $35.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-99.2M | $181.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-114.0M | $-624.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-106.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-97.1M | $164.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-125.7M | $230.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6B | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-218.9M | $618.0K |
| Q4 25 | -285.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -346.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -446.9% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -482.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -358.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -640.5% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5133.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -851.1% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | -227.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -245.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -320.7% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -333.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -253.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -438.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4958.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -819.3% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.37 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.46 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.18 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.49 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.94 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.06 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.05 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $249.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $33.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $82.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $249.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $214.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $853.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $958.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $199.7M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $82.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $85.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $86.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $89.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $89.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.8M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.9M | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -146.5% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-299.9M | $-72.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.8M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-63.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-77.0M | $714.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-95.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-104.6M | $394.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-171.8M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-207.3M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-63.6M | $735.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-77.3M | $-105.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-95.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-105.6M | $-466.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-173.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-209.8M | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | -146.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -175.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -217.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -298.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -368.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -541.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -785.3% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GRAL
| Screening Revenue | $42.3M | 97% |
| Developmental Services Revenue | $1.3M | 3% |
GTIM
Segment breakdown not available.
