vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. (GRDN) and SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.6M vs $319.3M, roughly 1.1× SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC). SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 4.0%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.4% vs 2.2%).
CVS Pharmacy Inc. is an American retail corporation. A subsidiary of CVS Health, it is headquartered in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. Originally named the Consumer Value Stores, it was founded in Lowell, Massachusetts, in 1963.
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and affiliated companies, commonly shortened to Nationwide, is a group of large U.S. insurance and financial services companies based in Columbus, Ohio. The company also operates regional headquarters in Scottsdale, Arizona and Des Moines, Iowa. Nationwide currently has approximately 24,000 employees, and is ranked No. 72 in the 2025 Fortune 500 list.
GRDN vs SAFT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.6M | $319.3M |
| Net Profit | $13.5M | $20.1M |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 8.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.0% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 11.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 46.1% | 147.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.21 | $1.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $397.6M | $319.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.4M | $326.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $344.3M | $316.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $301.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $286.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $295.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $269.8M |
| Q1 26 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $20.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-122.0M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.6M |
| Q1 26 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $73.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $50.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $232.4M | $892.3M |
| Total Assets | $426.9M | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.06× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $64.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $65.6M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.5M | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $49.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $64.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.2M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $232.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.9M | $892.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.5M | $899.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.7M | $873.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $163.2M | $850.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $828.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.9M | $851.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $810.2M |
| Q1 26 | $426.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $412.7M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $348.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.1M | $194.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $192.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 60.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.45× | 9.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.6M | $194.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.2M | $85.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $124.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 9.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.21× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.86× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
