vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Greenpro Capital Corp. (GRNQ) and Laser Photonics Corp (LASE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laser Photonics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.3K vs $900.5K, roughly 1.0× Greenpro Capital Corp.). Greenpro Capital Corp. runs the higher net margin — -139.9% vs -506.4%, a 366.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laser Photonics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs -53.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Greenpro Capital Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (16.9% CAGR vs -3.9%).
Greenpro Capital Corp. is a professional corporate service provider catering primarily to small and medium-sized enterprises across global markets, with a core focus on the Asia-Pacific region. Its key services include corporate advisory, asset management, cross-border business expansion support, corporate restructuring solutions, and capital raising consulting for growth-stage companies.
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
GRNQ vs LASE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $900.5K | $919.3K |
| Net Profit | $-1.3M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 88.8% | -20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -37.9% | -350.0% |
| Net Margin | -139.9% | -506.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -53.5% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -384.2% | -186.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $-0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $900.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.2K | $919.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $427.1K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.8K | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.7K | $716.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $361.2K | $623.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $658.4K | $743.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-513.2K | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-574.1K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-635.6K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $443.2K | $586.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-330.3K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-562.6K | $-934.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-265.5K | $-545.7K |
| Q4 25 | 88.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.2% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 80.4% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 73.5% | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.2% | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 88.2% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | 51.9% |
| Q4 25 | -37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -132.4% | -350.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -140.9% | -37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -195.3% | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | -255.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -87.7% | -238.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -166.6% | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -71.9% | -73.8% |
| Q4 25 | -139.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -130.5% | -506.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -134.4% | -68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -180.2% | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.9% | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -61.2% | -226.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -155.8% | -149.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.3% | -73.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $636.7K | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6M | $4.1M |
| Total Assets | $5.1M | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $636.7K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $775.4K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $833.2K | $78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $885.9K | $179.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $533.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0M | $13.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.8M | $763.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -199.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-407.9K | $763.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-531.7K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-240.9K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-151.0K | $632.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-500.8K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-540.0K | $-866.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-151.7K | $589.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-544.4K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | -199.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.1% | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -388.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -82.7% | -136.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.07× | -11.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
