vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globalstar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($72.0M vs $71.2M, roughly 1.0× HANMI FINANCIAL CORP). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -16.1%, a 46.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs 17.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Globalstar, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
GSAT vs HAFC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $71.2M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $21.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | 17.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | 20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $62.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $60.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $796.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $779.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $762.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | $751.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | $732.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | $736.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $707.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | $703.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $7.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | $7.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $206.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $203.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 286.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $356.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $146.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 286.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 206.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | 6.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
HAFC
Segment breakdown not available.
