vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and LXP Industrial Trust (LXP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LXP Industrial Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.7M vs $72.0M, roughly 1.2× Globalstar, Inc.). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs -16.1%, a 49.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Globalstar, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
GSAT vs LXP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $86.7M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 34.6% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | 33.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | -14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $87.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $100.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | $85.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $86.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | $-269.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 81.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 81.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 82.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | -0.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | $170.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | 0.66× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $170.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | $229.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | $70.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | $293.8M |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $188.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $188.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $44.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $39.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | $211.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $64.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $38.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | 1.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | 10.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
