vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globalstar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($72.0M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.8× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). Globalstar, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -16.1% vs -19.9%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs -20.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Globalstar, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
GSAT vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | $426.2M |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
