vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP (PGC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.2M vs $72.0M, roughly 1.1× Globalstar, Inc.). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -16.1%, a 31.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 17.6%). Over the past eight quarters, PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (21.4% CAGR vs 12.9%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Peapack Gladstone Financial Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company that provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, private banking, lending solutions, and trust services, primarily serving individual and small-to-medium business clients across New Jersey and the surrounding U.S. Northeast region.
GSAT vs PGC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $12.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 21.7% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | 31.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $658.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $658.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $642.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $629.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | $621.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | $605.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | $607.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $588.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | $582.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $43.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 18.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | $852.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-431.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 101.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | 3.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
PGC
| Banking Segment | $61.4M | 79% |
| Wealth Management Division | $13.9M | 18% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
