vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD) and i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.1M vs $52.7M, roughly 1.8× i3 Verticals, Inc.). Goosehead Insurance, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs 0.9%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Goosehead Insurance, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs -14.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.2% CAGR vs -4.7%).
Goosehead Insurance is a U.S.-based personal lines insurance agency that offers a wide range of coverage products including auto, home, renters, flood, and specialty insurance. It partners with hundreds of insurance carriers to provide clients with tailored, cost-effective coverage options, operating via corporate locations and a national franchise network for independent agents.
The Prusa i3 is a family of fused filament fabrication 3D printers, manufactured by Czech company Prusa Research under the trademarked name Original Prusa i3. Part of the RepRap project, Prusa i3 printers were called the most used 3D printer in the world in 2016. The first Prusa i3 was designed by Josef Průša in 2012, and was released as a commercial kit product in 2015. The latest model is available in both kit and factory assembled versions. The Prusa i3's comparable low cost and ease of co...
GSHD vs IIIV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $52.7M |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | $484.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 8.6% | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | -14.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 204.0% | -76.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | $52.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.0M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.6M | $63.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.9M | $52.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.0M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.1M | $46.2M |
| Q1 26 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $484.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-154.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $117.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $-7.5M |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.7% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | -2.8% |
| Q1 26 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 368.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | -16.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $4.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.7M | $37.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-121.3M | $358.5M |
| Total Assets | $392.8M | $595.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.4M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $55.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.2M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.3M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $9.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $290.0M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.8M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.3M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.6M | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $374.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-121.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-95.5M | $358.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.0M | $389.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-78.6M | $383.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-88.5M | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $375.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | $379.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $249.7M |
| Q1 26 | $392.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $414.9M | $595.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.6M | $638.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.6M | $623.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.6M | $646.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.7M | $726.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.1M | $730.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $861.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.87× | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 1.50× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $14.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $13.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 29.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $6.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.9M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | $-27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $-27.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | $7.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | -43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.38× | 29.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.06× | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.61× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.82× | 5.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSHD
| Renewal Royalty Fees (2) | $43.6M | 47% |
| Renewal Commissions (1) | $18.2M | 20% |
| Contingent Commissions (1) | $10.7M | 11% |
| New Business Royalty Fees (2) | $7.9M | 8% |
| New Business Commissions (1) | $7.5M | 8% |
| Other | $3.7M | 4% |
| Initial Franchise Fees (2) | $1.6M | 2% |
IIIV
| License And Service | $35.7M | 68% |
| Proprietary Payments Revenue | $14.5M | 27% |
| Other Revenue | $2.5M | 5% |
