vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD) and STEM, INC. (STEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.1M vs $47.1M, roughly 2.0× STEM, INC.). Goosehead Insurance, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs -33.9%, a 42.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Goosehead Insurance, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs -15.6%). Over the past eight quarters, STEM, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (36.1% CAGR vs 9.2%).
Goosehead Insurance is a U.S.-based personal lines insurance agency that offers a wide range of coverage products including auto, home, renters, flood, and specialty insurance. It partners with hundreds of insurance carriers to provide clients with tailored, cost-effective coverage options, operating via corporate locations and a national franchise network for independent agents.
StemCells, Inc. is a public biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Newark, California, that is developing purified human neural stem cells (HuCNS-SCs) in the hopes of treating central nervous system disorders and paralysis. StemCells' HuCNS-SCs have the ability to differentiate into the three main types of cells found in the central nervous system: neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.
GSHD vs STEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $47.1M |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | -17.7% |
| Net Margin | 8.6% | -33.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | -15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 204.0% | 68.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-4.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.0M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.6M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.9M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.0M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.1M | $34.0M |
| Q1 26 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $-23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $-51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $-148.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $-582.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.6% |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | -33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.7% | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | -65.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | -84.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | -493.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | -1705.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | -33.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | -62.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 527.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -76.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | -91.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -506.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | -1712.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $-4.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $-2.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-1.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-15.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $-18.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $-71.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.7M | $48.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-121.3M | $-249.4M |
| Total Assets | $392.8M | $308.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.4M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.2M | $58.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.3M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | $75.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $89.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $290.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-121.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-95.5M | $-249.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.0M | $-235.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-78.6M | $-214.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-88.5M | $-417.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $-398.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | $-344.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $-203.2M |
| Q1 26 | $392.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $414.9M | $308.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.6M | $362.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.6M | $379.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.6M | $405.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.7M | $437.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.1M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $691.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.9M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.5M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $-11.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.38× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.61× | -0.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSHD
| Renewal Royalty Fees (2) | $43.6M | 47% |
| Renewal Commissions (1) | $18.2M | 20% |
| Contingent Commissions (1) | $10.7M | 11% |
| New Business Royalty Fees (2) | $7.9M | 8% |
| New Business Commissions (1) | $7.5M | 8% |
| Other | $3.7M | 4% |
| Initial Franchise Fees (2) | $1.6M | 2% |
STEM
Segment breakdown not available.
